IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijaraf/v4y2014i4p280-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Traditional and Economic Performance Measures for Creating Shareholder’s Value: a Perspective from Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Shrikant Krupasindhu Panigrahi
  • Yuserrie Zainuddin
  • Azzlina Azizan

Abstract

This study investigates the importance of economic value added for the shareholders wealth maximization. Economic value added (EVA) is a value based performance measurement tool that inclines the agency conflict issues between managers and shareholders. Using a sample of 28 construction public listed companies in main board of Bursa Malaysia and using panel data with fixed effects during the period of 2003 to 2012, the findings of the study revealed that there is a positive and significant relationship between EVA and shareholder’s wealth maximization. The more the managers produce EVA, the more shareholders’ wealth maximization will be created. The finding shows significant support for EVA, but EVA was not reported by the companies and is not been used by investors for their investment decisions. Thus it is recommended for the managers to focus more attention to the criteria of EVA in evaluating shareholder’s value.

Suggested Citation

  • Shrikant Krupasindhu Panigrahi & Yuserrie Zainuddin & Azzlina Azizan, 2014. "Comparing Traditional and Economic Performance Measures for Creating Shareholder’s Value: a Perspective from Malaysia," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(4), pages 280-289, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijaraf:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:280-289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Article_26_Comparing_Traditional_and_Economic_Performance.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Article_26_Comparing_Traditional_and_Economic_Performance.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. M. Pandey, 2005. "What Drives the Shareholder Value?," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 1(1), pages 105-120.
    2. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    3. Elizabeth King, 2009. "Economic vs. Accounting Profit Rates," Springer Books, in: Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxation, chapter 0, pages 7-10, Springer.
    4. Ashwini K. Agrawal, 2012. "Corporate Governance Objectives of Labor Union Shareholders: Evidence from Proxy Voting," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(1), pages 187-226.
    5. Dennis G. Uyemura & Charles C. Kantor & Justin M. Pettit, 1996. "Eva® For Banks: Value Creation, Risk Management, And Profitability Measurement," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 9(2), pages 94-109, June.
    6. Young, David, 1997. "Economic value added: A primer for European managers," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 335-343, August.
    7. Elizabeth King, 2009. "Transfer Pricing and Corporate Taxation," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-0-387-78183-9, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Saleh Abd AL Khuja & ZainalAbidin Bin Mohamed, 2016. "Investigating the adoption of E-Business Technology by Small and Medium Enterprises," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 2(2), pages 71-84.
    2. Hanan Ali Al-Awawdeh & Sa¡¯ad Abdul Kareem Al-Sakini, 2018. "The Impact of Economic Value Added, Market Value Added and Traditional Accounting Measures on Shareholders¡¯ Value: Evidence from Jordanian Commercial Banks," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 1-40, October.
    3. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu & Silvia Avasilcai, 2021. "Performance Management for Growth: A Framework Based on EVA," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Sliman S. Alsoboa, 2017. "The Influence of Economic Value Added and Return on Assets on Created Shareholders Value: A Comparative Study in Jordanian Public Industrial Firms," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(4), pages 63-78, April.
    5. Muneer Mohamed Imhmed Abuazoom & Hanizun Bin Hanafi & Zul Zakiyuddin Bin Ahmad, 2017. "Influence of HRM Practices on Project Performance: Conceptual Framework," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(3), pages 47-54, March.
    6. Haruna, Dzugwahi & Apedzan Emmanuel, Kighir, 2018. "Ifrs Adoption And Shareholders' Wealth Of Deposit Money Banks In Nigeria," International Journal of Contemporary Accounting Issues-IJCAI (formerly International Journal of Accounting & Finance IJAF), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), vol. 7(2), pages 16-30, December.
    7. Oji Okpusa Oke & Kola Benson Ajeigbe, 2024. "Evaluating the Relationship between Accounting Variables, Value-Based Management Variables, and Shareholder Returns: An Empirical Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Taher Abdulsalam Ehbara & Syadiyah Abdul Shukor, 2016. "Impact of Service Quality Factors on Customer Trust in Libyan Airline Industry," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(5), pages 350-363, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dasgupta, Amil & Fos, Vyacheslav & Sautner, Zacharias, 2021. "Institutional investors and corporate governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112114, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Alex Edmans, 2014. "Blockholders and Corporate Governance," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 23-50, December.
    3. Vicente Cuñat & Mireia Gine & Maria Guadalupe, 2012. "The Vote Is Cast: The Effect of Corporate Governance on Shareholder Value," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(5), pages 1943-1977, October.
    4. John, Kose & Knyazeva, Anzhela & Knyazeva, Diana, 2015. "Employee rights and acquisitions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 49-69.
    5. Andrew Worthington & Tracey West, 2000. "A Review and Synthesis of the Economic Value-Added Literature," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 075, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    6. Edmans, Alex & Holderness, Clifford, 2016. "Blockholders: A Survey of Theory and Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 11442, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Erin E. Smith, 2019. "Are Antitakeover Amendments Good for Shareholders? Evidence from the Adoption of Antitakeover Provisions in the Post-SOX Era," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(04), pages 1-40, December.
    8. Di Giuli, Alberta & Matta, Rafael & Romec, Arthur, 2023. "Capital structure and reversible bargaining tools: Evidence from union-sponsored shareholder proposals," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Ngo, Anh & Duong, Hong & Nguyen, Thanh & Nguyen, Liem, 2020. "The effects of ownership structure on dividend policy: Evidence from seasoned equity offerings (SEOs)," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    10. In‐Mu Haw & Bingbing Hu & Donghui Wu & Xu Zhang, 2018. "Having a Finger in the Pie: Labor Power and Corporate Payout Policy," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 47(4), pages 993-1027, December.
    11. Sherif El-Halaby & Hosam Abdelrasheed & Khaled Hussainey, 2021. "Corporate Cash Holdings and National Culture: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa Region," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Nicholas Bloom & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2015. "Do Private Equity Owned Firms Have Better Management Practices?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 442-446, May.
    13. Tiziana La Rocca & Maurizio La Rocca & Francesco Fasano & Alfio Cariola, 2023. "Does a country's environmental policy affect the value of small and medium sized enterprises liquidity in the energy sector?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 277-290, January.
    14. Anna Stankiewicz-Mróz, 2019. "Influence of Interlocking Directorates on Integration after the Acquisition of Warsaw Stock Exchange—Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    15. Khémiri, Wafa & Noubbigh, Hédi, 2020. "Size-threshold effect in debt-firm performance nexus in the sub-Saharan region: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 335-344.
    16. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    17. Fenech, Jean-Pierre & Skully, Michael & Xuguang, Han, 2014. "Franking credits and market reactions: Evidence from the Australian convertible security market," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-19.
    18. Adrian Gourlay & Jonathan Seaton, 2004. "The determinants of firm diversification in UK quoted companies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(18), pages 2059-2071.
    19. Renneboog, L.D.R. & Simons, T., 2005. "Public-to-Private Transactions : LBOs, MBOs, MBIs and IBOs," Other publications TiSEM 3b76799c-591c-4d22-b126-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Bruinshoofd Allard & Kool Clemens, 2002. "The Determinants of Corporate Liquidity in the Netherlands," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijaraf:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:280-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/Accounting-Finance-Journal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.